Dark Shadows DVD Collection 5
|
List Price: $59.98
Our Price: $40.77
Your Save: $ 19.21 ( 32% )
Availability: Usually ships in 24 hours
Manufacturer: Mpi Home Video
Starring: Jonathan Frid, Grayson Hall, Nancy Barrett, Joan Bennett, Alexandra Isles
|
Average Customer Rating: 
|
|
Aspect Ratio: 1.33:1
Audience Rating: NR (Not Rated)
Binding: DVD
Brand: MPI
EAN: 9780788604560
Format: Box set
ISBN: 0788604562
Label: Mpi Home Video
Number Of Items: 4
Publisher: Mpi Home Video
Region Code: 1
Release Date: 2003-04-29
Running Time: 900
Studio: Mpi Home Video
Theatrical Release Date: 1966-06-27
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spotlight customer reviews:
|
Customer Rating: 
Summary: Great fun, but historically inaccurate
Comment: Dark Shadows is great fun. I enjoyed the series as a child, and I am enjoying it again on DVD.
Some previous reviews have extolled the historical accuracy of the part of the story that takes place in 1795. There is, however, a glaring historical inaccuracy in the part of the story about Victoria being accused of witchcraft, and bringing in the Reverend Trask from Salem to examine her.
The Salem Witch Trials took place from 1692 to 1693. The last witch trial in the world was held in 1782 in Switzerland. So the story taking place in 1795 is about a century out of date in having a witch hunter brought in from Salem. It is also over a decade out of date with regard to witch trials world wide.
A previous reviewer states that "Vicki's response to Trask is foolish, but understandable -- up to a point. In #385, Vicki SHOULD play along and pretend to be exorcised. However, someone from the present might not realize they take this witchcraft stuff SERIOUSLY in 1795." Although it is true that Vicki was foolish not to play along in the logic of the story, perhaps Vicki knew her real world history better than the writers, and apparently some viewers, of Dark Shadows.
Despite its historical inaccuracy, the witch hunt story is entertaining, and the Reverend Trask character introduced in this story is an interesting one.
The latter episodes of Collection 4 and the episodes of Collection 5 with the introduction and continuation of the 1795 story are noticeably better than the previous episodes of Dark Shadows in my opinion. This is largely due to the introduction of Angelique whose machinations propel the story at a greater pace and with more interesting twists and turns than was the case in earlier episodes.
Customer Rating:
Summary: dark shadow still the best
Comment: i just gotten into dark shadows . i'm up to the 8th collection now and still can't wait for the next one . you can't go wrong with dark shadows. it is a old tv show but i bet once you start watching this you won't stop. can't wait till number 8.
Customer Rating:
Summary: Years of Enjoyment
Comment: If your a Dark Shadows fan or know one then this whole series is worth the expense. My wife is a huge fan and I have been buying her one collection each Christmas. She has enjoyed these so much. I must admit that when I was younger we only had 4 TV stations to view. Usually Dark Shadows was on the station that we couldn't receive well. This has been great fun for me to view also. If you want to relive a great television experience or create a new one this is the series to buy.
Customer Rating:
Summary: Barnabas becomes a vampire; Victoria is accused of witchcraft
Comment: When the now-classic daytime soap opera DARK SHADOWS introduced the 175-year-old vampire Barnabas Collins (Shakespearean actor Jonathan Frid), the plan was to tell a closed-ended story, set entirely in the present day. The events of 1795 that made Barnabas a vampire and took away his true love Josette were to serve only as a back story. But Barnabas's popularity changed the plan. He was spared the hammer-and-stake treatment, viewers were transported to 1795, and that back story became the main plot.
This entire installment is set in 1795, where the witch Angelique (Lara Parker) is determined to steal Barnabas from Josette, and has no compunction about destroying the entire Collins family to do so. Eventually, their confrontation reaches a crises in which Angelique turns Barnabas into the vampire we met way back in episode #210 (set 1).
To be fair to Angelique, you could argue that Barnabas had his fun with her, then dumped for the high-class woman. But you could counter-argue that Angelique is (and so perhaps always was) motivated at least partly by status-consciousness. In #373, she's trying on Josette's hat. In #374, she's using (then zapping) Josette's rose water. In #410, she's arguing with Joshua Collins (Barnabas's father) over her legal and financial rights as Barnabas's widow, even as she's rushing to prevent Barnabas returning as a vampire.
To the extent that Angelique is motivated by love, it's ironic that she understands one significant truth while missing the bigger truth. She understands that hexing Barnabas to make him love her would gain her nothing, because his love would be synthetic. The bigger truth she misses is that you can't force anyone to love you by any type of coercion or manipulation.
Note that events are inconsistent with the accounts we've gotten from the present-day Barnabas, particularly in #345 (set 4). I'm told this is because Anthony George left the show, forcing a reworking of the storyline.
AG's departure also also meant recasting the ghost of Jeremiah Collins -- body by Timothy Gordon, voice by Addison Powell. This leads me to say that I'm not happy with Jeremiah's ghost being dropped from the story with no resolution. (He'll turn up again briefly in the 1897 storyline to give Kitty Soames a good scare.)
A secondary storyline involves Victoria Winters, the vehicle for the trip back to 1795. In #365 (set 4), Vicki participated in a seance that sent her back in time, and the viewers followed her. Vicki's mysterious arrival and seeming ability to predict the future convince several members of the 1795 Collins family that she's a witch -- responsible for all of Angelique's machinations. Enter Reverend Trask (Jerry Lacy), a self-ordained, fanatical witch hunter from Salem. Eventually, Trask gets Vicki arrested -- with Angelique's clandestine assistance.
Vicki's response to Trask is foolish, but understandable -- up to a point. In #385, Vicki SHOULD play along and pretend to be exorcised. However, someone from the present might not realize they take this witchcraft stuff SERIOUSLY in 1795. When Trask ties Vicki to the tree, though, I would think she should see that he means business and perhaps say, "If I stay tied to this tree all night and it DOESN'T die, that proves I'm innocent, right?"
The irony is that Trask is right about a witch at Collinwood, but misses the real witch because, in #387, Angelique is shrewd enough to play the game Vicki wouldn't play.
Trask is probably offensive to a lot of Christians and being one myself, I understand, because he's the sort of character that gives Christians a bad name. However, we're intended to see Trask as a poor excuse for a Christian. Forbes vehemently denounces Trask in #385. In fact, Trask illustrates a point of Christian morality. He fails because of a flaw in his character that a true man of God dare not indulge -- egotism. He comes very close to catching Angelique, but she escapes because she licks his boots. Later, when his exorcism rite succeeds so perfectly, it never occurs to him that anybody but himself was responsible.
This leads me to mention the bonus interview with Jerry Lacy on Disk 3, in which Lacy opines that the 1795 Trask was the "purest" of the three Trasks he played in the course of DS -- the one driven by idealism rather than any overtly criminal motive.
Another interesting bonus interview is the one with composer Robert Cobert on Disk 4, in which Cobert talks about how he presented the DS theme to series creator Dan Curtis by whistling it for him.
In the other two bonus interviews, Jonathan Frid describes how he got the part of Barnabas by more or less dumb luck, and Kathryn Leigh Scott mentions her reservations about "going supernatural."
Other points of interest:
Victoria's reaction Ben in #372 probably puzzled 1967 viewers who hadn't seen the pre-Barnabas episodes, and so didn't know who Matthew was. Fortunately, we have those episodes (1) along with the synopsis in set 1.
I liked Naomi's statement to Abigail in #382 that "If the devil has blinded me, I consider it curious that he lets you in on all his plans."
#386 contains both a reference to the Revolutionary War and Barnabas's "Innocent until proven innocent" blooper.
In #374, Josette's portrait shouldn't be in Josette's room. It doesn't officially arrive until #402.
#400 includes the technical blooper in which Angelique's house of cards burns up too soon and she's left shouting "Burn! Burn!" over a pile of ashes. It's obvious if you're looking for it, but maybe not if you're wrapped up in the story, especially if you don't know what was supposed to happen.
The word "vampire" is used for the first time in #410.
In the next installment, we'll see that becoming a vampire was only the beginning of that curse ...
(1) At the time of this writing, only on VHS, but I understand they'll be released on DVD.
Customer Rating:
Summary: After watching the first five sets, I'm still hooked
Comment: The entirety of Dark Shadows Collection 5 takes place in 1795, as we see first hand all the events and details leading up to the vampiric curse being placed on poor Barnabas Collins. And though Barnabas isn't yet the villainous presence we all know and love in these 40 episodes, one needn't worry about a shortage of villainy in this set: the cunning, manipulative witch Angelique and the creepy Reverend Trask do a more than adequate job providing the scares and jolts, and keeping things interesting.
After watching five full sets of these episodes, the series remains compelling and somewhat addictive. Perhaps Dark Shadows never "jumped the shark" and remained strong to the end. In any event, I look forward to shortly reporting on Collection 6!
|
|
|
Editorial Reviews:
|
Customer Rating:
Summary: Great fun, but historically inaccurate
Comment: Dark Shadows is great fun. I enjoyed the series as a child, and I am enjoying it again on DVD.
Some previous reviews have extolled the historical accuracy of the part of the story that takes place in 1795. There is, however, a glaring historical inaccuracy in the part of the story about Victoria being accused of witchcraft, and bringing in the Reverend Trask from Salem to examine her.
The Salem Witch Trials took place from 1692 to 1693. The last witch trial in the world was held in 1782 in Switzerland. So the story taking place in 1795 is about a century out of date in having a witch hunter brought in from Salem. It is also over a decade out of date with regard to witch trials world wide.
A previous reviewer states that "Vicki's response to Trask is foolish, but understandable -- up to a point. In #385, Vicki SHOULD play along and pretend to be exorcised. However, someone from the present might not realize they take this witchcraft stuff SERIOUSLY in 1795." Although it is true that Vicki was foolish not to play along in the logic of the story, perhaps Vicki knew her real world history better than the writers, and apparently some viewers, of Dark Shadows.
Despite its historical inaccuracy, the witch hunt story is entertaining, and the Reverend Trask character introduced in this story is an interesting one.
The latter episodes of Collection 4 and the episodes of Collection 5 with the introduction and continuation of the 1795 story are noticeably better than the previous episodes of Dark Shadows in my opinion. This is largely due to the introduction of Angelique whose machinations propel the story at a greater pace and with more interesting twists and turns than was the case in earlier episodes.
Customer Rating:
Summary: dark shadow still the best
Comment: i just gotten into dark shadows . i'm up to the 8th collection now and still can't wait for the next one . you can't go wrong with dark shadows. it is a old tv show but i bet once you start watching this you won't stop. can't wait till number 8.
Customer Rating:
Summary: Years of Enjoyment
Comment: If your a Dark Shadows fan or know one then this whole series is worth the expense. My wife is a huge fan and I have been buying her one collection each Christmas. She has enjoyed these so much. I must admit that when I was younger we only had 4 TV stations to view. Usually Dark Shadows was on the station that we couldn't receive well. This has been great fun for me to view also. If you want to relive a great television experience or create a new one this is the series to buy.
Customer Rating:
Summary: Barnabas becomes a vampire; Victoria is accused of witchcraft
Comment: When the now-classic daytime soap opera DARK SHADOWS introduced the 175-year-old vampire Barnabas Collins (Shakespearean actor Jonathan Frid), the plan was to tell a closed-ended story, set entirely in the present day. The events of 1795 that made Barnabas a vampire and took away his true love Josette were to serve only as a back story. But Barnabas's popularity changed the plan. He was spared the hammer-and-stake treatment, viewers were transported to 1795, and that back story became the main plot.
This entire installment is set in 1795, where the witch Angelique (Lara Parker) is determined to steal Barnabas from Josette, and has no compunction about destroying the entire Collins family to do so. Eventually, their confrontation reaches a crises in which Angelique turns Barnabas into the vampire we met way back in episode #210 (set 1).
To be fair to Angelique, you could argue that Barnabas had his fun with her, then dumped for the high-class woman. But you could counter-argue that Angelique is (and so perhaps always was) motivated at least partly by status-consciousness. In #373, she's trying on Josette's hat. In #374, she's using (then zapping) Josette's rose water. In #410, she's arguing with Joshua Collins (Barnabas's father) over her legal and financial rights as Barnabas's widow, even as she's rushing to prevent Barnabas returning as a vampire.
To the extent that Angelique is motivated by love, it's ironic that she understands one significant truth while missing the bigger truth. She understands that hexing Barnabas to make him love her would gain her nothing, because his love would be synthetic. The bigger truth she misses is that you can't force anyone to love you by any type of coercion or manipulation.
Note that events are inconsistent with the accounts we've gotten from the present-day Barnabas, particularly in #345 (set 4). I'm told this is because Anthony George left the show, forcing a reworking of the storyline.
AG's departure also also meant recasting the ghost of Jeremiah Collins -- body by Timothy Gordon, voice by Addison Powell. This leads me to say that I'm not happy with Jeremiah's ghost being dropped from the story with no resolution. (He'll turn up again briefly in the 1897 storyline to give Kitty Soames a good scare.)
A secondary storyline involves Victoria Winters, the vehicle for the trip back to 1795. In #365 (set 4), Vicki participated in a seance that sent her back in time, and the viewers followed her. Vicki's mysterious arrival and seeming ability to predict the future convince several members of the 1795 Collins family that she's a witch -- responsible for all of Angelique's machinations. Enter Reverend Trask (Jerry Lacy), a self-ordained, fanatical witch hunter from Salem. Eventually, Trask gets Vicki arrested -- with Angelique's clandestine assistance.
Vicki's response to Trask is foolish, but understandable -- up to a point. In #385, Vicki SHOULD play along and pretend to be exorcised. However, someone from the present might not realize they take this witchcraft stuff SERIOUSLY in 1795. When Trask ties Vicki to the tree, though, I would think she should see that he means business and perhaps say, "If I stay tied to this tree all night and it DOESN'T die, that proves I'm innocent, right?"
The irony is that Trask is right about a witch at Collinwood, but misses the real witch because, in #387, Angelique is shrewd enough to play the game Vicki wouldn't play.
Trask is probably offensive to a lot of Christians and being one myself, I understand, because he's the sort of character that gives Christians a bad name. However, we're intended to see Trask as a poor excuse for a Christian. Forbes vehemently denounces Trask in #385. In fact, Trask illustrates a point of Christian morality. He fails because of a flaw in his character that a true man of God dare not indulge -- egotism. He comes very close to catching Angelique, but she escapes because she licks his boots. Later, when his exorcism rite succeeds so perfectly, it never occurs to him that anybody but himself was responsible.
This leads me to mention the bonus interview with Jerry Lacy on Disk 3, in which Lacy opines that the 1795 Trask was the "purest" of the three Trasks he played in the course of DS -- the one driven by idealism rather than any overtly criminal motive.
Another interesting bonus interview is the one with composer Robert Cobert on Disk 4, in which Cobert talks about how he presented the DS theme to series creator Dan Curtis by whistling it for him.
In the other two bonus interviews, Jonathan Frid describes how he got the part of Barnabas by more or less dumb luck, and Kathryn Leigh Scott mentions her reservations about "going supernatural."
Other points of interest:
Victoria's reaction Ben in #372 probably puzzled 1967 viewers who hadn't seen the pre-Barnabas episodes, and so didn't know who Matthew was. Fortunately, we have those episodes (1) along with the synopsis in set 1.
I liked Naomi's statement to Abigail in #382 that "If the devil has blinded me, I consider it curious that he lets you in on all his plans."
#386 contains both a reference to the Revolutionary War and Barnabas's "Innocent until proven innocent" blooper.
In #374, Josette's portrait shouldn't be in Josette's room. It doesn't officially arrive until #402.
#400 includes the technical blooper in which Angelique's house of cards burns up too soon and she's left shouting "Burn! Burn!" over a pile of ashes. It's obvious if you're looking for it, but maybe not if you're wrapped up in the story, especially if you don't know what was supposed to happen.
The word "vampire" is used for the first time in #410.
In the next installment, we'll see that becoming a vampire was only the beginning of that curse ...
(1) At the time of this writing, only on VHS, but I understand they'll be released on DVD.
Customer Rating:
Summary: After watching the first five sets, I'm still hooked
Comment: The entirety of Dark Shadows Collection 5 takes place in 1795, as we see first hand all the events and details leading up to the vampiric curse being placed on poor Barnabas Collins. And though Barnabas isn't yet the villainous presence we all know and love in these 40 episodes, one needn't worry about a shortage of villainy in this set: the cunning, manipulative witch Angelique and the creepy Reverend Trask do a more than adequate job providing the scares and jolts, and keeping things interesting.
After watching five full sets of these episodes, the series remains compelling and somewhat addictive. Perhaps Dark Shadows never "jumped the shark" and remained strong to the end. In any event, I look forward to shortly reporting on Collection 6!
With its alluring tales of Gothic mystery and supernatural intrigue, Dark Shadows became one of the most popular daytime series of all time. Since first airing on ABC-TV from 1966-71, Dark Shadows has earned the reputation as being one of the most unusual and enduring programs in television history. The character of Barnabas Collins, a guilt-ridden 175 year-old vampire, brought the show tremendous success. In 1795, the beautiful and jealous witch Angelique attempts to destroy Barnabas' romance with his fiance, Josette DuPres. She enslaves Collins family servant Ben Stokes to assist her evil plans. Abigail Collins and Natalie DuPres find evidence they believe proves Victoria Winters is a witch. The family moves into the newly-built Collinwood mansion and the fanatical witch-hunting Reverend Trask is summoned to exorcise the Old House. A vengeful Angelique places a vampire curse on Barnabas. Bonuses: Interviews with actors Jonathan Frid, Kathryn Leigh Scott, Jerry Lacy and music composer Robert Cobert. Starring: Joan Bennett, Jonathan Frid, Kathryn Leigh Scott, Louis Edmonds, Lara Parker, Anthony George, Nancy Barrett, David Ford, Clarice Blackburn, Joel Crothers, Grayson Hall, Jerry Lacy, David Henesy and Alexandra Moltke
|
|
|
- Ask about this healthcare product "Dark Shadows DVD Collection 5" in the forum
- Give review on this healthcare product "Dark Shadows DVD Collection 5" in the forum
- Search related information in the forum
|
|
|
|
|
|
